|CDC painting by numbers: The numbers |
need to represent reality - actual cases are much
higher than those reported to the CDC.
I'm going to provide you with a case definition for Lyme Disease, and see what you have to say about it.
Do you think it is better than the current CDC case definition? Or worse? Why or why not?
What do you think needs to change, and how would you change it?
What do you think is missing? What should be added?
Please share your view in comments - I want to see what people say about this provided definition first and then see if we can collectively rewrite a better one.
A systemic, tick-borne disease with protean manifestations, including dermatologic, rheumatologic, neurologic, and cardiac abnormalities. The best clinical marker for the disease is the initial skin lesion, erthyma migrans, that occurs among 60-80% of patients.
Clinical case definition
- Erythema migrans, or
- At least one late manifestation, as defined below, and laboratory confirmation of infection
Laboratory criteria for diagnosis
- Isolation of Borrelia burgdorferi from clinical specimen, or
- Demonstration of diagnostic levels of IgM and IgG antibodies to the spirochete in serum or CSF, or
- Significant change in IgM or IgG antibody response to B. burgdorferi in paired acute and convalescent phase serum samples
Case classification: a case that meets one of the clinical case definitions above
This surveillance case definition was developed for national reporting of Lyme disease; it is not appropriate for clinical diagnosis.
Definition of terms used in the clinical description and case definition:
A. Erythema migrans (EM)
For purposes of surveillance, EM is defined as a skin lesion that typically begins as a red macule or papule and expands over a period of days to weeks to form a large round lesion, often with partial central clearing. A solitary lesion must reach at least 5 cm in size. Secondary lesions may also occur. Annular erythematous lesions occurring within several hours of a tick bite represent hypersensitivity reactions and do not qualify as EM. For most patients, the expanding EM lesion is accompanied by other acute symptoms, particularly fatigue, fever, headache, mild stiff neck, arthralgia, or myalgia. These symptoms are typically intermittent. The diagnosis of EM must be made by a physician. Laboratory confirmation is recommended for persons with no known exposure.
B. Late manifestations
Late manifestations include any of the following when an alternate explanation is not found:
Recurrent, brief attacks (weeks or months) of objective joint swelling in one or a few joints, sometimes followed by chronic arthritis in one or a few joints. Manifestations not considered as criteria for diagnosis include chronic progressive arthritis not preceded by brief attacks and chronic symmetrical polyarthritis. Additionally, arthralgia, myalgia, or fibromyalgia syndromes alone are not criteria for musculoskeletal involvement.
Any of the following, alone or in combination:
Lymphocytic meningitis; cranial neuritis, particularly facial palsy (may be bilateral); radiculoneuropathy; or rarely, encephalomyelitis. Encephalomyelitis must be confirmed by showing antibody production against B. burgdorferi in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), demonstrated by a higher titer of antibody in CSF than in serum. Headache, fatigue, paresthesia, or mild stiff neck alone are not criteria for neurologic involvement.
Acute onset, high-grade (2nd or 3rd degree) atrioventricular conduction defects that resolve in days to weeks and are sometimes associated with myocarditis. Palpitations, bradycardia, bundle branch block, or myocarditis alone are not criteria for cardiovascular involvement.
Exposure is defined as having been in wooded, brushy, or grassy areas (potential tick habitats) in a county in which Lyme disease is endemic no more than 30 days before onset of EM. A history of tick bite is NOT required.
D. Disease endemic to county
A county in which Lyme disease is endemic is one in which at least two definite cases have been previously acquired or in which a known tick vector has been shown to be infected with B. burgdorferi
E. Laboratory confirmation
As noted above, laboratory confirmation of infection with B. burgdorferi is established when a laboratory isolates the spirochete from tissue or body fluid, detects diagnostic levels of IgM or IgG antibodies to the spirochete in serum or CSF, or detects a significant change in antibody levels in paired acute and convalescent phase serum samples. States may determine the criteria for laboratory confirmation and diagnostic levels of antibody. Syphilis and other known causes of biologic false-positive serologic test results should be excluded when laboratory confirmation has been based on serologic testing alone.
Well, what do you think? What works? What needs rewriting and why?